Tuesday, November 24, 2009

The Soon-to-arrive 'Big Machine'

By now, many have concluded that the current administration is being used to crash the American economy. They didn't start the crash, but they will be finishing it. The debt load is so large now that our taxes only pay the interest to the privately held federal reserve banks who funnel it to others like the Chicoms holding our notes. The questions become: what is the purpose of this destruction; what is the goal of this managed destruction?

It is evident that the Obama/Democrat controlled government is radically leftist. The people now destroying the American economy and thus the Constitutional Republic are far more radical than their inspirations such as Francis Piven or even Saul Alinsky. It is also becoming more apparent that these radical leftists are not occupying their positions of their own efforts ... these radical 'progressives' have been funded and directed by some other force. I believe the clues point inexorably toward a banking force so large that it is outside the consciousness of the average person.

Bush allowed Bernanke and Paulson (the Fed Reserve principles in the Bush administration, who have now insured Goldmen-Sachs a member of the system) to aim the nation's monetary system in the direction of consolidation through focused liquidation. The Obama administration followed up with focused takeovers of financially vulnerable auto companies which unions had made brittle to the point of insolvency. With these two points --the banking protection and government control of auto companies-- I think we were given the first major clues to the banking interests behind the current purposeful destruction of the American economy.

Cap and Trade was designed to take control of the means to produce energy and the means to tax the consumption of energy. The obamacare leg is designed to give the government the means to control every aspect of life related to health, including the food industry and the commercial dispensing of healthcare. With the federal foot in the door, anything which can be construed to impact health will be then regulated/controlled by the federal oligarchy, which means the banking interests, ultimately.

A misdirection game is being played out before our eyes. This new machine is based upon old European social democracy now updated to make democratic process subservient to dictatorial oligarchy of the banking powers, via the political processes shammed up to look like democratic process. While we are focused upon the extreme radicals of the Obama administration and Obama himself, the real machine being constructed by the banking powers is sliding into place, world-wide.

You might ask, 'So, how do the banking powers get back control over the world systems once the radical commies have destroyed the capital market system? ... If the radicals bring down America and end the potential of American might being used to enforce transition of the world to a controlled central authority, how do the banking powers wring control away from these radicals?'

The answer is as simple as managed chaos, and as complex as world governance. Radical destroyers can never govern. Once the control by one system is murdered, some other system of organization must be instituted in order for the world to run on time once again. Once the American economy is bankrupted beyond recovery (and we are extremely close to that point now; with Obamacare the economic impact will be the last straw finally breaking the system down over a five to eight year period), the new 'world economic system' will be the skeleton around which the new order from chaos will be established.

So, the machine being built is much larger than merely the destroyer of the American economy. Even the insidious Obama commie regime will crumble before this larger machine. The machine is a world banking system/world governing board controlled by a select few who are now holding all the asset deposit receptacles. The unions and election cheating systems are merely the tools this larger monster machine is using. If it has escaped your notice, Andy Stern and Wade Rathke are expanding SEIU and ACORN world-wide. Europe has already succumb to the complete usurpation of individual liberty. The 300,000,000 American rebels are the last obstacle to this new world order.

If you're asking how the Chicoms can be reigned in to allow this new world order to take complete control, consider whose debt they now carry to any negotiation of world economic system! If you wonder what the effect of the Islamofascists will be, ultimately, they can be nothing more than a dissonance to be squelched with sufficient destructive force.

It is tiny Israel which stands as the most obstinate bump in the New World Order road. And even they can be manipulated to do the bidding of the larger force because Israel will fight to prevent their total annihilation, which works right into the squelching of Islam, eventually, turning Islamic governors into the willing allies of the NWO. The people of Islam are the toothy sheep of demonic manipulation. The income doling 'princes' are the real power in Islam.

I wonder what the name of the world currency will be? ... Quatloos perhaps? ;^)

Friday, September 25, 2009

Indoctrination Anyone?

Imagine what is being done without parental notification if this little video happened to surface in liberal New Jersey! And this is part of what Obama and his marxist administration had planned to accompany the personal touch of Obama speaking to all students on a specified day ...


* * *

Update 10/15/09

Well, that's so fascist typical of Youtube, to yank the video off their files because it reveals too much of the Obama-marxist goals for our children. Censorship is a nasty word to liberals, when someone tries to squelch porn so it doesn't infect the minds of children. But let a truthful video of leftist agenda infecting children with faux green philosophy/propaganda be posted and the fascists at Youtube rush in to squelch that! ... Yes, the above link no longer works.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Why Is Barry Telecasting Himself To All School Children on September 8th? ... Limelight

Children aged twelve to sixteen are only a few short years from being the largest voting constituency for not only Obama in 2012 but his avowed commie, Van Jones-inspired Apollo Alliance socialist/fascist dream nation.

When excon, black nationalist turned outspoken communist Jones dreamed up a welding of social justice, green movement, and unions into an alliance for radical change of Amerika, he knew well that the children must be indoctrinated to be the foundation of making these societal engineering changes permanent else adults will quickly reject the dole based feckless nanny state.

William Ayers, being a close friend and associate of Barry Obama—much more than just a past terrorists fellow traveler with Wade Rathke of the same Weather Underground—it is the method of indoctrination of children through the federally controlled school system that is a specialty of Ayers (he even traveled to Venezuela to assist in arranging such an excellent system). So the Pres_ _ent cannot but step into the limelight of the ongoing programming of children in social justice and green issues, to marshal their worship and solidify the indoctrination with complete cooperation of the National Education Association union members! All three legs of Van JOnes's Apollo Alliance for societal engineering are represented in that bargain.

When Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Hussein on the Potomac, said five days before the election in 2008 that radical change was coming to America, he meant what he said, and his radicals now ensconced in White House czaristas should leave no one wondering which way his change is directed. We are to become a better version of Chavez's Venezuela, if Barak and his henchradicals can manage it. With the silence of American parents, he will do just that!

* * *

For those with children in public schools, here is an outline copy of what every school has been sent, to align the public schools with the agenda of the telecast.

Before the Speech:

·Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama and motivate students by asking the following questions: Who is the President of the United States? What do you think it takes to be President? To whom do you think the President is going to be speaking? Why do you think he wants to speak to you? What do you think he will say to you?
· Teachers can ask students to imagine being the President delivering a speech to all of the students in the United States. What would you tell students? What can students do to help in our schools? Teachers can chart ideas about what they would say.
· Why is it important that we listen to the President and other elected officials, like the mayor, senators, members of congress, or the governor? Why is what they say important?

During the Speech:

·As the President speaks, teachers can ask students to write down key ideas or phrases that are important or personally meaningful. Students could use a note-taking graphic organizer such as a Cluster Web, or students could record their thoughts on sticky notes. Younger children can draw pictures and write as appropriate. As students listen to the speech, they could think about the following: What is the President trying to tell me? What is the President asking me to do? What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?
· Students can record important parts of the speech where the President is asking them to do something. Students might think about: What specific job is he asking me to do? Is he asking anything of anyone else? Teachers? Principals? Parents? The American people?
· Students can record any questions they have while he is speaking and then discuss them after the speech. Younger children may need to dictate their questions.

After the Speech:

· Teachers could ask students to share the ideas they recorded, exchange sticky notes or stick notes on a butcher paper poster in the classroom to discuss main ideas from the speech, i.e. citizenship, personal responsibility, civic duty.
· Students could discuss their responses to the following questions: What do you think the President wants us to do? Does the speech make you want to do anything? Are we able to do what President Obama is asking of us? What would you like to tell the President?
· Teachers could encourage students to participate in the Department of Education?s ?I Am What I Learn? video contest. On September 8th the Department will invite K-12 students to submit a video no longer than 2 min, explaining why education is important and how their education will help them achieve their dreams. Teachers are welcome to incorporate the same or a similar video project into an assignment. More details will be released via www.ed.gov .

Extension of the Speech:

Teachers can extend learning by having students
· Create posters of their goals. Posters could be formatted in quadrants or puzzle pieces or trails marked with the labels: personal, academic, community, country. Each area could be labeled with three steps for achieving goals in those areas. It might make sense to focus on personal and academic so community and country goals come more readily.
· Write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president. These would be collected and redistributed at an appropriate later date by the teacher to make students accountable to their goals.
· Write goals on colored index cards or precut designs to post around the classroom.
· Interview and share about their goals with one another to create a supportive community. Participate in School wide incentive programs or contests for students who achieve their goals.
· Write about their goals in a variety of genres, i.e. poems, songs, personal essays.
· Create artistic projects based on the themes of their goals.
· Graph student progress toward goals.

Folks, this is way beyond a man inserting himself for hero worship. This is no less than the planned, refined indoctrination of America's children, to enlist them in the 'change' Obama has brought to Amerika with his radical czarist regime. National Socialism is raising it's very bloody, deadly head in America. It is being birthed through an unholy alliance of 'social justice', the green movement, and unions, currently the brainchild of one very radical and dangerous man, Van Jones. But this dangerous change to America is not an overnight phenomena, it has been fomenting through the public education system, colleges and universities for deacdes. It is just that a dyed in the wool avowed communist and his Pres_ _ent now have the Democrat Party empowerment to finsih U.S. off, finally.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

The Old Republic is Falling to Fascist/Communist Coup de Tat

In answer to several people at FreeRepublic claiming the '60 million gunowners' are the check to the Obama imbalance, I wrote the following on the discussion thread we have every day for watchers of Glenn Beck's FOX program. I don' t think I'm all that far off the mark here. Tyranny from totalitarians is what we are witnessing being built in America.

[[ For those who have put so much faith in the so far lawful weaponry we possess, let's take a look at how the commies and fascists will work their magic, this time. Remember please, they have the lessons learned in Germany, Russia, and Venezuela. We are perhaps confused because these usurpers are using communistic as well as fascist tactics.

The Americorp/Obamacorp approach will indoctrinate millions and millions of youth and willing elders into the cult of the obama-nation. These inductees will be paid and put to work on make work projects and feel good tasks.

Eventually, the Americorp alums will be so sold on the cult that they will be the pacification influence tool put to work in communities.

First, they will be called to talk, then get in your face if you disagree with the 'wave sweeping the wounded nation'. Eventually, most folks will buckle under the pressure from insistent voices and the growing scarcity of food and fuel.

Finally, a well observed body of elites will be taken aside to form the numbers of an armed protector force, 'to stop violence in struggling communities'. Massive unemployment aids the fascist process because households are over-stressed, and eventual scarcities always result from massive unemployment! More people are moved onto the rolls of government dependents.

This process is the wedding of Communism, Fascism, and societal engineering. Right now, there are literally millions who are speaking out against the communistic takeover of the healthcare industry. But right now we are well fed and housed and have gas to drive to townhall meetings and still get to the grocery, work, and church. We hardly even raised our voices as the banking industry was nationalized, and two major car companies were brought under obama rule in fascist fashion, and control handed to the unions.

As the Obama nation takes more fascist control over industries buckling under threats, the federal oligarchy will hold the U.S. in a strangling grip with which to stifle dissent, cower the moderates, and starve the unfaithful to the Obama wave. Eventually, after a few of U.S. scattered across the nation take up arms and resist the fascist bastards, even those guns will be silenced by the trained 'peacekeepers' sent to make life safer for those in compliance with dictates from the lord high obama and his fascist czars/advisers. And make no mistake, when the shooting starts, there will be tens of thousadns of volunteers in service to the obamessiah new America.

What the blustering do not understand is, the process will not happen in such a way as to allow a clear line of demarcation. Communities will be fractured by an onslaught of propaganda from the enemy fifth column media (once called the fourth estate), by debates allowed to happen under ever increasing scarcities, and by community organizing 'to hold on while the hard times pass'.

The massing of tens or hundreds of armed resisters will not happen in the populated centers because the vast majority of dependent sheeple will be led to see resisting the obama nation as a threat to their personal and family survival. These sheeple will be the willing allies in pointing out whom is the kink in the cogs. Some of U.S. will die with William Wallace's battle cry on our lips, and find true freedom. The vast majority will whimper and cry to be protected by the organized community and it's elite forces.

The Fascist of today may have hate to spare in their hearts, but they are not stupid, and their conquering of Amerika and sweeping away of the Old Republic will hear mostly 'feed us' rather than free us. ]]

Monday, August 24, 2009


From where have these thousand page plus bills sprung onto the American scene in so short a time? From the minds of ‘progressives’, ‘social activists’, and ’enlightened social engineers’ not even in political office prior to Obama taking control! Literally, within hours after Congress went into session in 2009, Congressional committees were issuing lengthy bills being rushed through for passage into law. Congressman Obey, whose committee issued the Stimulus Package, couldn’t have conceived of such a lengthy socialist oriented bill in so short a time. He took the framework from already designed change oriented progressives not even in government, but rather in activist organizations seeking to change America, FAST. The dirty little secret perhaps missed by not reading the entire bill before voting on it is that the Stimulus Package contained billions in funding for these ‘progressive’ organizations, much of which will flow through front organizations of parent orgs who have joined in an alliance to change America!

As Barack Obama rose to prominence in 2008, rising with him was an agenda represented as a three-legged stool conceived as the brain child of Van Jones, now green jobs czar. But several of the czars answering only to the White House are sent up from the legs of this change oriented alliance stool, like Brian Deese, who worked for John Podesta and was appointed to fashion the ‘cash for clunkers’ government dole debacle designed to keep union jobs solvent by moving union made cars off of storage lots. This three-legged stool is named ‘The Apollo Alliance’ and the legs are unions, the green movement, and ‘social justice‘.

The unions include SEIU, the AFL-CIO, and the United Steelworkers, to name three. The green movement includes Sierra Club, Green Peace, and League of Conservative Voters, to name only three. The ‘social justice’ leg includes ACORN, ‘black farmers’, and the Ella Baker Center, to name three, yet ACORN is literally more than a hundred front organizations funneling taxpayer monies back to radical weatherman Wade Rathke‘s brain child.

It was the goal of Van Jones to integrate these three ‘change oriented’ fronts to achieve a rapid and complete transformation of America, by combining the assets of these general movements under one directive, the Apollo Alliance project. [ Van Jones was an avowed black nationalist serving time in prison when he became an avowed communist. He is now serving Obama’s administration as the green jobs czar. ]

ACORN was founded by weatherman Wade Rathke, who was subsequently on the board of the Tides Foundation, which funded and gave credence to the Apollo Alliance. SEIU’s current VP, Gerald Hudson, is on the Apollo Board. John Podesta, president of the Soros funded Center For American Progress, is on the Apollo Board. Phil Angelides, once treasury secretary for the bankrupt California government is on the Apollo Board. In fact, if one looks at the board members of the Apollo Alliance, it is peopled by radicals and change oriented activists who have functioned in leadership roles for activist groups.

If you are not familiar with a social methodology know euphemistically as the Cloward-Piven Strategy, it would be good to take a long look at that methodology for changing America. Basically, the strategy embraces overloading services funded by the federal government in order to crash the system and sweep away the powers that be, to be replaced by ‘social justice’ mongers, the green movement, and various social change orgs like unions. Manufactured crisis is the hallmark of the Cloward-Piven strategy. Does Rahm Emanuel’s crisis quote come to mind? It should! To activist leadership, a crisis should never be allowed to go to waste.

That Cloward-Piven strategy to crash the system of federal funded programs, combined with a fascist approach to taking over control of major aspects of the American economy is what the Obama Administration is all about. The evidence is now overwhelming that such is the goal. The people writing the agenda for their brand of federal government are in fact right out of the Apollo Alliance and subsidiary orgs such as ACORN, SEIU. And Green Peace. Harry Reid even thanked the Apollo Alliance for helping to write the Stimulus bill, and the TARP bill oozed from a similar source.

First came nationalizing of the private banking system, reacting to a major financial crisis which threatened to close banks with too many calls on their assets, at nearly $600 billion before the calls were shut down. The source of those calls has yet to be made public, if anyone actually knows beyond the goons making the calls on assets. The plea was that if the fed did not inject nearly a trillion dollars immediately and seize the major banks (Goldman Saks and its competitors), the world-wide system would be crashed and all credit would seize up, stopping commerce world-wide.

While Bush was still in office, the first injection and seizure occurred. Then, when Obama came into power, the nationalizing of private banking industry was enacted, with Goldman Saks at the top because of Paulson’s influence. [ Hank Paulson was the past President of Goldman Saks, before becoming Bush’s Treasury Secretary.] As a sprinkling of infused cash was paid back, the monies were not paid back to the taxpayers, they were instead re-directed to other banking ‘needs’, in countries like Germany!

The next phase was to pass a cap and tax bill, which was the green movement’s leg of the Apollo Alliance equivalent of seizing the means for energy production and use in America. This action, if passed finally into law, will in fascist fashion give complete control of energy in America to the federal oligarchy Obama is fashioning. And 85% of the projected collections from energy producers and users has already been promised to constituent organizations rather than the federal tax coffers!

The next phase was to seize major portions of the American auto industry, in service to the union leg of the fascist Apollo Alliance stool. Oddly, Ford Motor Company declined the ‘offer’ and has remained solvent. Control of the auto industry reaches deeply into any industrial function associated to auto production, such as steel production, and will give the federal oligarchy power over every industry where unions can force their way in via the ‘balloting’ which unions may use to strong-arm non-union workers, effectively giving power to threaten any industry with union shutdown if their demands are not met. With the nationalizing of GM and Chrysler, we are witnessing the Obama administration service to a second leg of the Apollo stool, the unions.

The next phase is to take over the broad institution of healthcare in America, by demonizing the insurance industry and seizing the payment methodology for reimbursing physicians and medical institutions, while running the insurance industry out of business over the next ten years. [ The health-care industry is the largest employer in the U.S. It produces almost 17 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product. ]

As a means to institute ‘social justice’, taking over the healthcare industry will extend government forced medical care to illegals and welfare dolees at the expense of degrading the fundamental care, efficiency, and soundness of our current doctor run healthcare system. Federal oligarchs will make treatment decisions, dictate whom will receive what level of treatment, and control the means of housing and caring for all ages of American citizens. Death panels are but a small aspect of such fascist controls, and the means to formulate such panels was actually tacked on at the end of the Stimulus Bill already passed into law. Regions now seen as ‘red’ will be strong-armed into following the oligarch’s system or be denied payments and upgrades until they comply and follow the federal ‘mandates’.

Healthcare systems without entrepreneurial incentive see research in medicines and treatment advancements grind to a halt. Government run Healthcare will perniciously degrade the American healthcare system which is now hallmarked by innovation and technological discovery. Under total government control, focus will switch quickly from Doctor-Patient perspective, to bureaucrat-patient-doctor … the doctor could become less than a current physician’s assistant, relegated to merely following the guidelines dictated by federal oligarchs. With the new system, the federal bureaucracy will dictate ‘care‘ and terminations of same.

So, from whence came the healthcare bill now slogging through discussion at town halls and congressional backrooms? Whom designed this monster being spun, twisted, and lied about in the fifth column enemedia, in service to the Obama administration?

Well, since we know the TARP and Stimulus bills had major input from Apollo Alliance, it’s a sure bet that the healthcare bill is also the product of radical thinkers. And we need look no further than John Holdren, Jacob Hacker, and Tom Daschle to see the origins of a monster fascistic usurpation now claimed by congressional deadheads. Jacob Hacker was the ‘health industry’ adviser to the Edwards, Obama, and Clinton campaigns in 2008. John Holdren is the current science czar int eh White House, and he has openly advocated for population controls as the means to stop global degradation of the environment. He does not recognize a newborn as fully a human beings until perhaps socialization has begun! Retired Senator Tom Daschle has been pushing healthcare ‘reform’ as a lobbyist for years. Given his experience during the Clinton years, it was his advice to Obama that healthcare reform be passed quickly, before the public could discover the vagaries and debate begun in earnest over the issues.

The healthcare reform alliance is yet another brainchild of progressives who really don’t like the America we recognize, so they are hard at work changing it, sweeping away the Old Constitutional Republic, to be replaced by a federal oligarchy perhaps already too powerful to stop. We The People are being transmogrified--to borrow a term from Calvin & Hobbes--into subjects of a federal oligarchy, conceived by the Democratic Party as a benevolent despot empowered through burdensome taxation, tasked with controlling every social institution upon which individual existence depends.

Welcome to Obama’s Amerika, comrade. Progressives will take care of you and your offspring … from government approved birth to federally mandated burial.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

What's In A Name?

Who knows where or even when Barack Hussein Obama was born? We can't even be assured that his name is in fact legally Barack Hussein Obama!

The phony exhibit shown on the Internet via Factcheck.org., Daily KOS, and Obama's own campaign website was claimed to be a photocopy of an Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth for one Barack Hussein Obama, natality August 4, 1961. But that document was proven to be a complete fabrication built from many layers of photoshop material, and the Vital Records department in Hawaii has stated that they did not issue a CoLB for Obama in June 2007 (that's the date bleeding through from the reverse side of the forgery, a forgery which had no raised stamp, also; later exhibits showed the raised stamp)! The first exhibit, the obvious forgery, has been scrubbed from the Internet, although it is cached at several safe locations not accessible to Factcheck and Daily Kos, awaiting court scrutiny if a suit ever makes it to the discovery phase.

Was this 'greater than Allah' liar-in-chief born somewhere else and his grandmother registered him in Hawaii, so he could be an American citizen through the very slack Hawaiian birth registry system which didn't even require more than someone applying for a BC without any proof except the sworn statement from the applicant seeking registry for the child?

Was the name on the first registry Barry Dunham, with 'father un-named'?

Since no marriage license has ever surfaced for Stanley Ann Dunham and Barak Obama, even with a divorce decree from 1964, there is no proof that Barack Hussein Obama, pres_ _ent, is in fact the actual biological son of Barak Obama, Kenyan.

Barack Obama might have been born in Kenya, in 1961, or even in Canada in 1961, and even in Hawaii in 1961. Without documents from credible sources the American people are being treated to the middle finger from Barry Obama (Barry Obama was one of the names he used in High School and college), as if we the people have no right to require an affirmative action applicant provide proof dictated by the law that is the Constitution!

In reply to Barry Obama's 'Screw you, America, I'm not divulging my past to you peons', I'm going to offer a little lesson in applied reasoning based upon known facts from Barry's lie, er, I mean life.

First, some conjecture: if the child born to Stanley Ann Dunham did not have a father listed upon first registry in Hawaii, we may accept that when Barak Obama-Kenyan allowed himself to be successfully sued for divorce in 1964, he allowed the name Barack Hussein Obama to be registered in Hawaii for the child, even if he, Barak Obama-Kenyan, was not the biological father. So, we may now move on to what is not conjecture.

A few years after receiving a court divorce from Barak Obama (that is the way the Kenyan spelled his own name), Stanley Ann married one Lolo Soetoro, Indonesian. The wedding happened in Hawaii, but a marriage cert for that event has not yet surfaced. Shortly after or at the time of marrying Stanley Ann, Lolo formally adopted little Barack, in Hawaii, and named him officially Barry Soetoro, passing Indonesian citizenship to the little guy.

Within a few months Lolo was off to Indonesia and then points further away, doing his job for a petroleum company. Stanley Ann followed him to Indonesia within a few more months, bringing Barry along. Barry Soetoro went to school in Indonesia. That's where he learned to recite so perfectly the call to Islamic prayer.

Stanley Ann was officially an Indonesian via her marriage to Lolo Soetoro, so she likely traveled to Indonesia with her son Barry using Indonesian passports ... contrary to lies circulating on the Internet, even a child of four was required to have a passport/Visa to travel into Indonesia from Hawaii.

Within a few years, Lolo was no longer residing permanently with Stanley Ann, even though they had conceived a daughter named Maya. Stanley sent Barry back to Hawaii at age ten to live with his grandfather Stanley Dunham and grandmother Madelyn (Toot). Barry Soetoro entered the States on his Indonesian passport at age ten. We can be confident of that because he remained the adopted son of Lolo, named Barry Soetoro-Indonesian, until Stanley divorced Lolo in 1980.

Fast forward to 1979, June. Barry Obama (yes, he was using that name, though there is absolutely no indication that a formal name change had occurred in a court) graduates from an Hawaiian High School and in August of 1979 enters Occidental College in California, still legally named Barry Soetoro, though it is not clear whether he was allowed to enter Occi as Barry Obama without providing proof credentials for that name. BUT, he could have passed himself off as Barry Obama by showing some document from Hawaiian vital records dated to before he was adopted formally by Lolo Soetoro!

In 1980, Stanley Ann files in Hawaii for divorce from Lolo Soetoro who is already playing house with a different woman back in Indonesia. In her pleading to the court, Stanley Ann cites TWO children of the marriage whom Lolo is legally responsible to support, a minor child, Maya, and a child over eighteen who needs financial/educational assistance. That child is Barry Soetoro, student at Occidental College! In 1980, Barry is still legally Barry Soetoro, adopted son of Lolo Soetoro.

There is no documentation to show that Barry Soetoro ever made a formal legal name change to Barak/Barack Obama. Interestingly, Barry traveled to Indonesia and Pakistan (and perhaps to India, but it is not clear if he went into India or remained in the Pakistani side of a particular border city). As far as we may reason, the only passport ever issued for the son of Stanley Ann Dunham was an Indonesian passport which Barry traveled under at age four and age ten. It is possible, and in fact likely that Barry Soetoro traveled to Pakistan as an Indonesian citizen in 1982. Interesting also is the fact that Barack Obama's passport files were broken into THREE TIMES prior to the election of 2008! Barry traveled overseas in 1993, but we have no documentation to show what passport/nationality he traveled under then, either!

By the time Barry arrives at Columbia University in New York, he is calling himself Barak and Barry ... Obama. But he was a student at Columbia when he traveled to pakistan, so he was likely holding/using(?) two names at that time.

Fast forward to Barack Hussein Obama applying for the Bar Association in Illinois. When filling out the application, the current occupant of the Oval Office lied to the state by signing that he had used no other name than Barack Hussein Obama in his lifetime! I wonder if anyone in corrupt Chicago or the state of Illinois would find it of interest to see that this Barack Hussein Obama may still legally be Barry Soetoro?

And a couple of final notes. Not only was the first CoLB posted on Obama's campaign website and at Factcheck a forgery, the Selective Service registration exhibits Obama offered upon being questioned if he had ever registered for same, well, that material is obviously forged also. The 'stamped' date with the exhibit has his eighteenth year, but is shown as the named postal service which did not come into existence until later, and the typing is so bungled from erasure and type over, the document wouldn't pass a bank teller's scrutiny, much less a documents experts examination! And that faked CoLB the media is waving about from his website and Factcheck? Well a retired FBI documents expert has officially in sworn affidavit to Californai courts stated that the exhibit is not credible for court purposes!

The above facts are but part of why there are 'Birthers' like me still digging for the truth about the 44th Pres_ _ent. We still have no credible ID for this liar-in-chief David Axelrod, master of astroturfing, has foisted upon America.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

We Have A Criminal From A Criminal Enterprise Political Party In The Oval Office

Here is a quick list of deceits the Pres_ _ent has committed regarding his history ... finding more is very difficult because the fraud has sent detectives and lawyers out to bury his past, like the only file missing from the kindergarten he attended is, you guessed it, Barry Obama, aka Barry Soetoro's file!

-- Obama lied on his application to the Illinois Bar Association and the photocopy is part of legal filings in court, where he swore that he had never been known by any name except Barack Obama ... he has used Barry Dunham, Barry Obama, and Barry Soetoro as so far discovered

-- Obama's Selective Service card is so badly forged that the type face doesn't even match, and may have been created erecently because to become an Illinois legislator he would have to have registered Selective Service when he turned eighteen, and probably didn't

-- Obama filed on the Internet a supposed copy of his CoLB he claimed was sent from Hawaii ... it is a clear forgery, a false document which, when it appeared a legal case just might get to discovery, the Obama campaign goons scrubbed the forgery from their Internet site and everywhere else they could, including Daily KOS

-- After posting a clear forgery of a supposed CoLB through the Obama-servile Factcheck website, Obama presented an exhibit to the same factcheck.org people (and other journalist outlets like World Net Daily, to be fair here); Factcheck posted his first forgery has claimed that this is the real CoLB from Hawaii; Factcheck has said he showed to them his actual original birth certificate and they were allowed to handle it and photograph it

-- The supposed newspaper birth announcements, for Barry from supposedly 1961, mysteriously surfaced from microfiche files listing an address where witnesses have said no black man with a white wife and a mixed baby ever lived, a home occupied by a different family, continuously, until just three years ago; the address may in fact be the residence address for the Nordykes (Dr and Mrs) who had twins just hours after Barack was supposedly born in the same hospital, but oddly the Nordyke twins are not in the list of births found in the suspicious newspaper exhibit

-- The driver's License listed on the parking tickets from Cambridge Mass from when Barry was in Harvard reference a Social Security number which belonged to a man long dead; the number was assigned more than a hundred years ago to someone else and is a Connecticut issue

-- Barack Obama has 39 different social security numbers and they are listed in a court filing in California

It is interesting to note that an Hawaiian official representing the Vital Records Department in Hawaii just yesterday 7/28/09) stated that the official has seen the documentS in the Hawaiian archives that prove Barack Obama is a native born Hawaiian which proves he is a natural born citizen!

Such a legal finding--stating that he is Constitutionally a natural born citizen--would be just the sort of statement the Obama/Acelrod/Emanuel goons would present for the sympathetic or under duress official to say, but would indicate two things:

1) The poor official was far from unbiased and professional, allowing to be so blatantly used by a White HOuse in panic mode.

2) The public statement was anything but a simple statement released in business as usual in Hawaii; someone is leaning on Hawaiian Health Department officials to help someone try and squelch the relentless effort to have Barack Obama disclose the simple facts about his birth and life--which is definitely unlike the disclosure past Presidents and Presidential candidates have undergone in order fro the voters to know whom they are voting for, information so fundamental to what is the reality of the figure presented by the political party for the job of President of the United States.

The way the media, which has transmogrified from biased to down right DNC servitude, is doing the Pres_ _ent's dirty work rather than seeking the truth of his history is a shocking revelation of just how far down the toilet journalism in America has been flushed. Even the head of CNN made a bold-faced lie on air, stating that Hawaii destroyed all paper records when they created their electronic filing system ... Jon Klein's effort to shut down Lou Dobbs for simply agreeing that it is not outrageous to expect the Pres_ _ent show to the American people what they have to show to obtain a passport, or even entry into the little league baseball system!

Monday, July 27, 2009

Obama Is A Liar, By His Own Signed Documents

No, this is not an essay about Barack Obama's perjury when he applied for the Illinois Bar Association. It is instead an address of the duplicitous deceit open to any in media, if they were actually doing the fourth estate work they used to do, before transmogrifying themselves into the fifth column enemy of We The People.

During the run for the Democratic Party nomination, Barack Obama signed/entered apps to all fifty states which stated that he swears he is qualified for the position of President according to the Constitutional eligibility requirements. Signing onto the McCain Senate resolution indicates Obama does accept the definition as applied to McCain's particulars, two citizen parents + born on U.S. soil.

On his own website, Obama states that his father was a British subject from a British colony now an independent nation called Kenya.

Iterating again, in April of 2008, Barack Obama signed on to a Senate resolution which addressed McCain's status as a natural born citizen. The resolution stated specifically that McCain was a natural born citizen because he was born to two American citizen parents and was born on American soil.

Barack Obama has contradicted his own sworn applications for the primaries in all fifty states, because he does not meet the Constitutional requirements he himself signed onto with the Senate resolution concerning John McCain's status.

So, if this is not perjury of sorts, what could it be? ... The affirmative action liar-in-chief swore to all fifty state election officials that he was eligible according to the Constitutional requirements, but he has stated openly that his father was not an American citizen, yet Obama signed onto the Senate resoultion which stated clearly that McCain was a natural born citizen because he had two American citizen parents and was born on American soil.

An open liar/perjurer is now pretending to be the eligible President of the United States handing out orders as CIC (at least one brave soldier has challenged the liar, however) and signing into law legislation which he is not actually eligible to sign as President of the United States ... and the Democratic Party demands through their slugslime media outlets that American voices objecting to this liar-in-chief just shut up and get out of the way of this illegitimate poseur! This same slugsliming media wave a false CoLB which Obama posted on his website, as if this forgery is proof of qualification that Obama has already attested he cannot meet because his father was a British subject!

Should we be surprised that this liar continues to lie and dissembling in nearly every area of his life and political work? ... As far as I can tell, he hasn't told any lies regarding the White House family dog. At the rate this Democrat liar-in-chief is moving, it might be better to try and list what things he has not lied about! Sadly, there appear to be none in the media who care that this open liar is a LIAR in the Oval Office.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Media Lies For Their Affirmative Action Messiah

Here is a long portion from a deceitful editorial written to shill for a lying Pres__ent who has committed document fraud with forgery, offered from a typical obamanoid enemedia source which seeks to keep lies afloat for Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Hussein Obama. Following the lying filth from Fartley is a letter sent to him by a man who has done the research to expose Barry’Obamas criminal fraud. Enjoy, I’ve posted them here to save them for posterity since so many things are scrubbed from the Internet which expose the criminal affirmative action fraud-in-chief.

I have taken the liberty of adding a few comments in italics.

Obama's birth certificate: Final chapter. This time we mean it!
By Robert Farley
Published on Wednesday, July 1st, 2009 at 7:12 p.m.
Politifact.com [ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/ ]

Back on June 27, 2008, PolitiFact published a story we hoped would put the whole Obama birth certificate controversy to rest. It ran under the now-laughable headline, "Obama's birth certificate: Final chapter."

Oh, how naive we were.

More than a year later, the debate continues to rage on the Internet among the "Birthers" movement, people who doubt that President Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as president. Or at least, they say, Obama has yet to sufficiently prove things one way or the other. [As far as I can discover, this is one of the few truthful entries in this obscenity from Fartley.]

The conservative WorldNetDaily.com Web site is the conductor of the Birther train. On the site, you can donate money to rent billboard space that asks "Where's the Birth Certificate?" They've got a petition demanding the president produce his original birth certificate — now signed, they say, by 400,000 people. From the site, you can buy "Where's the Birth Certificate?" yard signs and bumper stickers. The site has recently run stories about a man whose attempts to sell a purported Obama birth certificate from Kenya on eBay have been repeatedly shut down.

And on May 28, WorldNetDaily.com correspondent Lester Kinsolving pressed the issue all the way to the White House, squeezing in a couple questions at the end of a daily press briefing with White House spokesman Robert Gibbs.

Here's how the exchange went:

Kinsolving: "One question concerning what the president said in his speech on Thursday, and I quote, 'I ran for president promising transparency, and I meant what I said. This is why, whenever possible, we will make information available to the American people so they can make informed judgments and hold us accountable.' End of quote. Do you remember that statement?"

Gibbs: "I can confirm he said that."

Kinsolving: "Good. In consideration of this very good promise of transparency, why can't the president respond to the petitioned requests of 400,000 American citizens by releasing a certified copy of his long form birth certificate listing hospital and physician?"

Gibbs: "Are you looking for the president's birth certificate?"

Kinsolving: "Yes."

Gibbs: "It's on the Internet, Lester."

Kinsolving: "No, no, no — the long form listing his hospital and physician."

Gibbs: "Lester ... This question in many ways continues to astound me. The state of Hawaii provided a copy, with a seal, of the president's birth. I know there are apparently at least 400,000 people that continue to doubt the existence of and the certification by the state of Hawaii of the president's birth there, but it's on the Internet because we put it on the Internet for each of those 400,000 to download. I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we'll have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy." [ Gibbs lied dutifully, in typical convoluted fashion, like every good democrat will to protect their criminal-in-chief. ]

WorldNetDaily.com, through an owner, the Western Center for Journalism, responded with an ad in the conservative publication Human Events that called Gibbs' response arrogant, factually incorrect, lies.

Moreover, the ad said, "members of the liberal elitist media ... instead of pressing Gibbs on his outrageous statements ... openly laughed."

The ad is right about that; journalists could clearly be heard chuckling at Kinsolving's questions.

The question here is, did Gibbs lie?

Some background: On June 13, 2008, after months of hounding by the media and wild Internet speculation that Obama was actually born in either Indonesia or Kenya, the Obama campaign finally released a copy of Obama's "Certification of Birth" from Hawaii and posted it on the Internet. [ This is a very important point since it is a major admission that the Obama campaign is behind the forgery which has been posted on the Internet! The specious CoLB ‘thing’ Obama has claimed is a valid Hawaiian document is a clear forgery with numerous contradictory aspects Dr. Ron Polarik has easily exposed! Even a retired documents expert with the FBI has submitted a sworn affidavit in the Keyes v Obama eligibility lawsuit in California which states the thing on the Internet is bogus! ] The document states that Barack Hussein Obama II was born on Aug. 4, 1961, at 7:24 p.m. in Honolulu, Hawaii, to parents Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama.

End of story? Hardly. If anything, it merely intensified the debate. Numerous critics arose on the Internet claiming the document was a fraud. It was the wrong color. It was missing an embossed seal. There was no crease from it being folded and mailed.

Our friends from FactCheck.org went to Chicago, held the document in their questioning hands and examined it closely. Their conclusion: It's legit. [ One would hardly expect document forgery co-criminals to state otherwise. I mean really, didn’t courts take Willie Suttons gang members’ statements as exonerating for Willie’s whereabouts? … Oh, they didn’t? … Exactly! ]

On Oct. 31, 2008, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii Department of Health, issued this statement: "There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.

"Therefore I, as director of health for the state of Hawaii, along with the registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.

"No state official, including Gov. Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the state of Hawaii."

Even the governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican who at the time was stumping for John McCain, said it was on the up-and-up. [ An interesting sleight of hand here, Fartley! The statements from Hawaii are placed together in your essay as if issued in a single release--they were in two separate releases, and you tried to infer that these statements are evidentiary of an Hawaiian long form but they are carefully worded to avoid making such an assertion since to do so would be a violation asserting the person making the statements had seen and was verifying what is written in the documents held in the Hawaiian vaults! This is the typical careful deceit characteristic of those sent to protect the affirmative action liar in the Oval office from being exposed. ]

Over? No way.

All that proved, the birthers concluded, was that there is, in fact, an original birth certificate, and that the public hasn't seen it. The new argument goes like this: Obama never published his "Birth Certificate" (a "Certificate of Live Birth") on the Internet; what he posted was a "Certification of Live Birth," what WorldNetDaily describes as "a 'short-form' document that is generated on-the-spot and based on what is contained in a computer database at the time it was printed out."

Some on the Internet speculate that the original "long form" — which might include the hospital where he was born as well as the attending physician — might show Obama was foreign-born and ineligible to be president, but that that wouldn't show up on the "short form."

Moreover, WorldNetDaily claims even the state of Hawaii doesn't accept "Certification of Live Birth" as proof that an individual was physically born in Hawaii.

They point to a policy from the Hawaii Department of Home Lands, which stated on its Web site:

"In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL."

That's actually a misnomer, said Lloyd Yonenaka, a spokesman for DHLL. In order to be eligible for their program, you must prove that your ancestry is at least 50 percent native Hawaiian. And when he says native, he means indigenous. They don't even care if you were born in Hawaii. [ This is a boldfaced lie. Typical! If one reads the list of requirements, one is aimed precisely at proving ‘born on Hawaiian soil, the presentment of a valid long form birth certificate! ] They use birth certificates as a starting point to look into a person's ancestry. Very different.

Here's what the DHLL site says now: "The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands accepts both Certificates of Live Birth (original birth certificate) and Certifications of Live Birth because they are official government records documenting an individual’s birth. The Certificate of Live Birth generally has more information which is useful for genealogical purposes as compared to the Certification of Live Birth which is a computer-generated printout that provides specific details of a person’s birth. Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth. When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth."

When we spoke to a spokeswoman for the Hawaii Department of Health, she said too much was being made of the difference between the so-called "long" and "short" forms.

"They're just words," said spokeswoman Janice Okubo. "That (what was posted on the Internet) is considered a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii." [ What Okubo actually stated when asked what she could verify regarding the thing posted on the Internet was that she could not know what that thing was since she had not seen the physical document from which the images--which she had not seen until that day--were produced! Professional lying is so quaint don’tchaknow. ]

"There's only one form of birth certificate," she said, and it's been the same since the 1980s. Birth certificates evolve over the decades, she said, and there are no doubt differences between the way birth certificates looked when Obama was born and now.

"When you request a birth certificate, the one you get looks exactly like the one posted on his site," she said. "That's the birth certificate."

As for the theory that Obama's original birth certificate might show he was foreign-born, Okubo said the "Certification of Live Birth" would say so. [ This is a proven lie since there is at least one very prominent Chinese man of historical import who held an Hawaiian CoLB stating he was born in Hawaii yet he was born in China. Lying is a way of life for obamanoids--Obama annoyance droids. ] Obama's does not. Again, it says he was born in Honolulu. [ So did Sun yat-sen’s! Sun Yat-sen, Chinese revolutionary and political leader often referred to as the “Father of Modern China,” was able to file a “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” application and immigrate to the US in 1904 using the form. And it shows Honolulu as his place of birth, just as the Internet forgery shows Honolulu as Barry’s place of birth. ]

We have one more thing. We talked to reporter Will Hoover, who wrote a well-researched story for the Honolulu Advertiser on Nov. 9, 2008, about Obama's childhood years in the the Aloha State. It ran under the headline "Obama Slept Here."

In researching the story, he went to the microfilm archives and found the birth announcement for Obama. Actually, he found two of them, one in his Honululu Advertiser on Aug. 13 , 1961, and in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin the next day . They both said the same thing: "Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Highway, son, Aug. 4."

But here's the thing. Newspaper officials he checked with confirmed those notices came from the state Department of Health.

"That's not the kind of stuff a family member calls in and says, 'Hey, can you put this in?'" Hoover explained.

Take a second and think about that. In order to phony those notices up, it would have required the complicity of the state Health Department and two independent newspapers — on the off chance this unnamed child might want to one day be president of the United States. [ This is the typical red herring deceit the obamanoid sycophants usually try, in order to make derisive assertions against any who would dare to require the lying CIC prove he is not a criminal fraud. Never have I read of a ‘Birther‘ making that assertion, that his mother or grandmother placed the entry so he could someday run for Pres__ent! But there are other more reasonable aims for placing a false entry regarding the affirmative action fraud‘s birth. Stench like Fartley are not likely to name them however, too plausible for their tastes. ]

In Honolulu, the Obama tour buses take you by the old Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital, now called Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women & Children. Federal laws prohibit hospital officials from confirming that he was born there, but Hoover said it's common knowledge among locals.

So back to the claim that Gibbs lied about posting Obama's birth certificate on the Internet. WorldNetDaily is correct that the Obama campaign didn't post his original birth certificate on the Internet. But their suggestion that there is some significant difference between the two documents is wrong. They both prove the same thing. Maybe the original would identify the hospital where Obama was born, but that's irrelevant. The issue is what city, and therefore country, was he born. The document posted by the campaign proves Obama was born in Honolulu, according to Health Department officials. And that's really the central issue here.

The Health Department says the "Certification of Live Birth" is Hawaii's version of a birth certificate. Calling it by other names — Certificate of Live Birth, Certification of Live Birth — is just semantics. WorldNetDaily may be right that the original birth certificate wasn't posted, but if Hawaii says the the document Obama posted can rightly be called Obama's birth certificate, how is Gibbs lying? We harbor no delusions that anything we say here will slow the persistent drumbeat of the birthers, but we rule this statement False.

. . .


And now for the crushing exposure of Mister Farley’s sycophantic deceits, by the man who has actually sepnt the time and has the expertise to expose the Internet fraud of Barack Hussein Obama.

Dear Mr. Farley:

I’m glad you find document fraud to be so funny, because the American people who were deceived by these phony images are not at all amused:

They certainly are not happy about Politifact promulgating a forgery.

Exactly which part of Obama’s spending a million dollars of campaign contributions to keep his real birth certificate hidden, is “laughable?”

Obama has gone the entire year without ever showing a real, paper birth certificate to anyone in government, anyone in authority, even anyone not shilling for him. What has been shown, however, is a totally fabricated Certification of Live Birth (COLB) image.

Now, what is a really sick joke is claiming that this heavily-doctored "scan image" that’s posted on Obama's website, Daily Kos Website, Politifact's website, and Factcheck's website, was made from the same object shown in Factcheck's photos: the ones with the exaggerated Seal impressions and second fold lines.

Even a five year-old can see that there’s no way in Hades that a high-resolution "scan image," with no Seal or second fold line showing, could ever have been made from the document object shown in the Factcheck photos.

Do you really think the American public is as mindless as the people perpetrating this fraud?

I have to give you props, though.

I never thought that Politifact could be more wrong than the last time they tried to pass off this forgery as the real deal.

It was back in June of last year. Amy Hollyfield was the reporter at the time, and in talking with Janice Okubo, she created a conundrum.

We all know Janice Okubo, don’t we? She’s that helpful Public Relations Officer (Communications Officer) at Hawaii's DOH, who’s not exactly Hawaii’s answer to Google when it comes to all things COLB.

When asked about Obama’s birth certificate, Okubo told Hollyfield that "a copy of the birth certificate was requested in June 2008," but she wouldn't specify by whom.

Even Amy pondered the implications of that statement as she was reviewing the many criticisms of the bogus "scan image":

• Isn’t the date stamp bleeding through the back of the document “June 2007?” (Odd since it was supposedly released in June 2008.)

"Odd, indeed!"

How can a 2007 Certification of Live Birth (COLB), date-stamped "June 6, 2007" have been requested in June 2008?

The answer, though, is quite simple, really:

Hawaii never produced a 2007 Certification of Live Birth for Obama with a date-stamp of June 6, 2008.

Last year, I spoke with the Hawaii State Registrar, himself, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, who provided me with the following bit of information.

When I asked him if Janice Okubo had confirmed that his office produced a 2007 COLB, date-stamped June 6, 2007, with Obama's birth information on it. He said,

"Absolutely not. No one in our office confirmed it.”

That’s right, Mr.Farley. Obama's 2007 COLB is a nonexistent document, and what’s shown in the "scan image" alleged to be real a real copy of Obama’s birth certificate is nothing but that same, original fabricated forgery that first appeared on June 12 of last year.

What does that "scan image" prove?

Document fraud. Internet fraud. Voter fraud. A forged Certification of Live Birth, designed and proffered with one purpose in mind: to deceive the American public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is qualified to be President.

A secondary purpose of this document fraud was to prevent citizens and lawmakers from ever seeing his real, original "vault birth certificate.

So, it comes down to this:

Anyone who says that Hawaii issued a 2007 COLB for Obama, and that a true copy of it is posted online, is either (a) misinformed, (b) misleading others, or (c) lying through their teeth.

Regarding Politifact's ridiculous “Truth-o-Meter,”

Did Press Secretary Robert Gibbs lie when he said that the Obama Administration posted a copy of his birth certificate online?

Did Clinton have sex with Monica Lewinsky?

Of course Gibbs lied. Obama’s Campaign lied. Factcheck lied. Daily Kos lied. Snopes lied. Politifact lied. The Star Bulletin lied. The Honolulu Advertiser lied. All the media who are in-the-tank with Obama lied. All of his liberal Leftist supporters lied.

But, the facts don’t lie. There is no 2007 COLB for Obama.

Last year, in addition to getting the word from Onaka, I conducted five months of empirical research that proved, conclusively and irrefutably, that the "scan image" alleged to be Obama's COLB is a fabricated image, and no amount of bitching by the opposition is going to change that fact.

I can't really blame them for thinking they see a real COLB instead of a phony one. After all, there are a lot of people who claim to see religious characters in Cheetos, corn flakes, or fried eggs.

It's all in their heads.

All of the statements claiming that the "scan image" posted online looks "identical" to an actual 2007 COLB, is pure nonsense.

None of the real scan images of a real 2007 COLB, as well as the photos taken of a real 2007 COLB, look anything like what Politifact and Factcheck claim.

The Seal shown in Factcheck’s photos looks nothing like the real Seal shown in real 2007 COLBs.

If you go to my website, The Greater Evil, and read my research, you’ll find at least twenty reasons why the image posted online is totally bogus.

I’ve got another twenty more that show how this one, bogus scan image has engendered the biggest cover-up in political history. All of the efforts made by Factcheck, Politifact, Snopes, and other, assorted Obama flunkies, have been either to promulgate the forgery as a real document or to cover up the fact that document fraud has taken place.

It goes like this: the Obama Campaign claims that they posted a genuine copy of Obama’s real, original birth certificate and then points to Factcheck when anyone asks for proof. Factcheck then refers them to their August 21 article, “Born in the USA,” and points the finger back at the Obama Campaign as the source of the real, original birth certificate.

And, so it goes. What a nice, neat little circle of deceit going on here.

One hand washes the other.

In case you forgot or never knew, Factcheck is funded by the Annenberg Foundation – the same foundation that gave a $30 million grant to William “The Unrepentant Pentagon Bomber” Ayers, to start the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, and then hire an inexperienced community organizer in one Barack Obama, to be the Chairman of the Board working alongside him.

Besides lying about Obama’s birth certificate and doing all it can to cover up the fraud, it was Factcheck who claimed that Obama never interacted with William Ayers as an adult -- let alone directly worked with him on the Annenberg Challenge. The lies that Factcheck has told run long and deep.

Nice sister site you got there, Robert.

Think about that the next time you want to write a screed about Obama's bogus birth certificate.


Dr. Ron Polarik

Sunday, July 5, 2009

A particularly poignant maundering

From Freerepublic.com, a short offering from one 'Ron Polarik' who has exposed the forgery Obama is using to speciously insist he is a natural born citizen of the United States of America:

We live in the Digital Age of communication and the virtual world of the Internet that has not only changed the way we send and receive information, but also how we interpret that information. Our interpretation of information on the Internet is heavily influenced by the trust we place in the sender of that information. We have seen instances where the exact, same information that has been sent by two different sources has produced entirely different responses that range from full agreement to total disbelief.

The Internet is primarily a visual medium and its visual imagery tends to evoke more polarizing responses than auditory ones.

The Internet permits hundreds of millions of people to view the same images, and to interpret them in the same way as they were intended to be. The deciding factor, however, in how images are perceived is contingent on the context in which they appear. The people who design the visuals we see, whether it’s on the Internet, on TV, or in print, pay particular attention to structuring the context in ways that convey their own interpretation. The extent to which the public will accept or reject another person’s interpretation depends on the amount of trust that viewer places on its source.

For a great many people, any media that bears the name of Barack Obama, that also bears testimony to his legitimacy as President, will be treated as the unadulterated truth, no questions asked. Barack Obama has a special personal image that he and the media go to great lengths to preserve. Obama engenders the kind of following that a rock star would envy, and being ranked as the top celebrity in America only confirms this status. Part and parcel to that popularity, in the minds of his followers, is the belief that Obama’s biographical narrative is totally true. That is why, whenever that biography is challenged, his followers take it as a personal affront to them.

Nowhere is this phenomenon more apparent than in the digital image purported to be a copy of Barack Obama’s original birth certificate. His followers are incensed that their leader’s legitimacy is being questioned. Conversely, they see no disconnect nor hypocrisy in delegitimizing John McCain in regards to his stated birthplace, his activities as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, his patriotism, his voting record, and most egregious of all, discriminating against him on the basis of his age. Yet, this is a typical characteristic of Obama’s followers in that they can maintain a double standard while simultaneously denying that one exists.

Yet, the cold, hard facts remain that Barack Hussein Obama has hidden from public scrutiny any concrete proof that would validate both his life’s narrative and more importantly, his Constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

Instead of spending $12 to obtain a certified paper copy of his birth record and presenting it to any government official, be it state or federal, Barack Obama has posted on his website, a fabricated image an abridged version of a birth certificate known as a “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB).

Instead of spending $12 to obtain a certified paper copy of his birth record and presenting it to any government official, be it state or federal, Barack Obama has illegally used $1 million in campaign contributions in legal fees to prevent his real, original birth certificate from ever being seen.

The fabricated image posted on Obama’s own website now become one of the most recognizable and infamous images in political history, and the historical storyline that goes along with this iconic symbol of secrecy is equally as compelling. It’s as if a President declared war, but never expected to fight one.

Yet, for the past year, the battles continue in a war of words and legal wrangling between Obama, his legal team, and his plausibly deniable shills at Factcheck, and We the People, the citizens of the United States, who literally live and die by the Constitution, who wanted nothing more than for both candidates who ran for President to be equally forthcoming when their Constitutional status was in doubt.

I doubt if anyone reading this document would allow an unknown person into his or her home after refusing to provide a legal form of identification. In essence, we allowed an unknown person to occupy the office of President who has also refused to identify himself.

Just as might be the case when you let an unknown stranger into your home and then find all of your possessions stolen, so, too, have Americans let an unknown stranger into their governmental home, and are only now learning how much of our money and freedoms have been stolen.

Frankly, Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Dunham, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Obama is not only a proven perjurer (he falsified his application to the Illinois Bar Association), he is a dangerous anti-American and a man with a twisted, wicked soul (he defended on more than one occasion the blatant killing via purposed neglect of just born alive infants in Illinois).

America is getting what she deserves for allowing the democrat party to too long use abortion as a political empowerment scheme. If the Obamanation destruction will stop short of utter abandon is the only question still unanswered. May God have mercy upon US.

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Learn From History, or Repeat the Mistakes

The following is from a thread discussion at FreeRepublic.com ... Freepers are very well educated and very smart people. Enjoy the truth as posted by Freeper 'sanchmo' ...

"The big risk for the US during this (current economic)crisis is that it follows the path of Britain’s pound.

In 1900, Britain was the world’s lone superpower, based on its position as the leading industrial economy, as a net exporter and a net lender. Its empire controlled massive swaths of land in Africa, North America, Australia and Asia. London was the world’s financial center, and the system of global trade was centered on the pound sterling - giving British subjects the most desired currency in the world and the most favorable position for access to strategic natural resources. But there were vulnerabilities - the cost of militarily protecting its position was growing while dozens of small threats ganged up strategically against the giant.

Up and coming competitors and recent entrants into the industrial revolution seemed poised to take Britain's position - most notably Germany and the US. Then came WW1 and the Great Depression. The world expected the impossible - that Britain’s industrial power and its pound sterling would be able to save the world. But it couldn’t - the policy required to maintain the global system of London-based, Pound-focused trade and finance (strong pound, low debt burden) was the exact opposite of that required to keep up the rate of British production and unemployment (cheap British exports) and the burden of war and fiscal stimulus (monetary inflation).

Britain became a net importer from the US during the wars, and a net borrower to pay for its war and economic recovery efforts. The global London/Pound based system collapsed in the 1930s, currency crises reduced the value of the pound, the empire began to unwind, and Britain was saved only by the discovery of oil in the North Sea, and by the power of the US, which emerged from WW2 and finally from the cold war at the top of the power pyramid.

From the 1920’s until today, the pound has declined by over 50% against world currencies, and by over 85% against the dollar, and during times of crisis it dives even deeper into the hole.

On to Washington and New York

With the destruction in Europe in WW2 and the loss of London and the Pound in the 1930s as the anchor of international finance & trade, the US and the Dollar took their place. Economists at first proposed that reserves be denominated in a pseudo-currency based on either a basket of international currencies (the SDR) or based on a wide basket of commodities (the bancor).

At Bretton Woods in 1944, the US negotiated an alternative where the US promised convertibility to gold in exchange for the world agreeing to use the Dollar as the global reserve. But the cost of the Marshall Plan, the Cold War, and the Great Society cost the US too much gold to maintain convertibility.

By the early 1970’s, Nixon cancelled gold convertability, and Nixon & Kissinger protected the dollar’s supreme position with a promise of US trade deficits (to provide foreigners a way to earn dollars and grow their economies), US budget deficits (to provide foreigners a safe place to invest those dollars), and growing imports of foreign energy (to increase demand by making the Dollar the currency used to buy oil).

In 1973, the US was still a net lender and exporter, but the unsustainability of the bargain was clear by Nixon economist’s comment to objectors that “if it can’t go on forever, it will stop.”

Since 1973 - for 35 years - the US has gone from a net exporter and net lender to a net importer & net borrower. Its future liabilities are unsustainable with current policy/guidelines.

US debt held by the public now exceeds 40% of GDP, and generally accepted guidelines of currency vulnerability say that when debt held by the public exceeds 50%-60% of GDP, the country is unable to spend its way out of a recession; and that debt held by the public of 65%-70% makes a country unable to defend itself against speculative attacks on its currency. Crisis-date estimates for those codition sare typically believed to be in the 2025-2050 range, although the combination or reduced tax revenue & increased social spending & bailouts in the current economic crisis threatens to bring the crisis date to the 2012-2020 range.

Today, the dollar is still the global standard and is in high demand around the world. But that is based on several vulnerable supports:

--the position of US treasury bonds as both a safe and profitable investment;
--the ability of the US economy to maintain its levels of net importing and net borrowing;
--its position as the medium of international trade for oil;
--the percention that the Fed can maintain its independence from US politicians, so that Fed policy does not hurt foreign dollar-holders.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

Here's a partner essay to be read after the one just below this one on this page regarding Alinsky methodology; for those wishing to know what the hell has happened to our country with the election of this affirmative action poseur-in-chief. Note please the Cloward-Priven startegy, and as you read, recall Rahm Emanuel's words regarding never letting a crisis go to waste.

American Thinker, September 8, 2008 by James Simpson

America waits with bated breath while Washington struggles to bring the U.S. economy back from the brink of disaster. But many of those same politicians caused the crisis, and if left to their own devices will do so again.

Despite the mass media news blackout, a series of books, talk radio and the blogosphere have managed to expose Barack Obama's connections to his radical mentors -- Weather Underground bombers William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis and others. David Horowitz and his Discover the Networks.org have also contributed a wealth of information and have noted Obama's radical connections since the beginning.

Yet, no one to my knowledge has yet connected all the dots between Barack Obama and the Radical Left. When seen together, the influences on Obama's life comprise a who's who of the radical leftist movement, and it becomes painfully apparent that not only is Obama a willing participant in that movement, he has spent most of his adult life deeply immersed in it.

But even this doesn't fully describe the extreme nature of this candidate. He can be tied directly to a malevolent overarching strategy that has motivated many, if not all, of the most destructive radical leftist organizations in the United States since the 1960s.

The Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis

In an earlier post, I noted the liberal record of unmitigated legislative disasters, the latest of which is now being played out in the financial markets before our eyes. Before the 1994 Republican takeover, Democrats had sixty years of virtually unbroken power in Congress - with substantial majorities most of the time. Can a group of smart people, studying issue after issue for years on end, with virtually unlimited resources at their command, not come up with a single policy that works? Why are they chronically incapable?


One of two things must be true. Either the Democrats are unfathomable idiots, who ignorantly pursue ever more destructive policies despite decades of contrary evidence, or they understand the consequences of their actions and relentlessly carry on anyway because they somehow benefit.

I submit to you they understand the consequences. For many it is simply a practical matter of eliciting votes from a targeted constituency at taxpayer expense; we lose a little, they gain a lot, and the politician keeps his job. But for others, the goal is more malevolent - the failure is deliberate. Don't laugh. This method not only has its proponents, it has a name: the Cloward-Piven Strategy. It describes their agenda, tactics, and long-term strategy.

The Strategy was first elucidated in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation magazine by a pair of radical socialist Columbia University professors, Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. David Horowitz summarizes it as:

The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Cloward and Piven were inspired by radical organizer [and Hillary Clinton mentor] Saul Alinsky:

"Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one. (Courtesy Discover the Networks.org)

Newsmax rounds out the picture:

Their strategy to create political, financial, and social chaos that would result in revolution blended Alinsky concepts with their more aggressive efforts at bringing about a change in U.S. government. To achieve their revolutionary change, Cloward and Piven sought to use a cadre of aggressive organizers assisted by friendly news media to force a re-distribution of the nation's wealth.

In their Nation article, Cloward and Piven were specific about the kind of "crisis" they were trying to create:

By crisis, we mean a publicly visible disruption in some institutional sphere. Crisis can occur spontaneously (e.g., riots) or as the intended result of tactics of demonstration and protest which either generate institutional disruption or bring unrecognized disruption to public attention.

No matter where the strategy is implemented, it shares the following features:

The offensive organizes previously unorganized groups eligible for government benefits but not currently receiving all they can.
The offensive seeks to identify new beneficiaries and/or create new benefits.
The overarching aim is always to impose new stresses on target systems, with the ultimate goal of forcing their collapse.

Capitalizing on the racial unrest of the 1960s, Cloward and Piven saw the welfare system as their first target. They enlisted radical black activist George Wiley, who created the National Welfare Reform Organization (NWRO) to implement the strategy. Wiley hired militant foot soldiers to storm welfare offices around the country, violently demanding their "rights." According to a City Journal article by Sol Stern, welfare rolls increased from 4.3 million to 10.8 million by the mid-1970s as a result, and in New York City, where the strategy had been particularly successful, "one person was on the welfare rolls... for every two working in the city's private economy."

According to another City Journal article titled "Compassion Gone Mad":

The movement's impact on New York City was jolting: welfare caseloads, already climbing 12 percent a year in the early sixties, rose by 50 percent during Lindsay's first two years; spending doubled... The city had 150,000 welfare cases in 1960; a decade later it had 1.5 million.

The vast expansion of welfare in New York City that came of the NWRO's Cloward-Piven tactics sent the city into bankruptcy in 1975. Rudy Giuliani cited Cloward and Piven by name as being responsible for "an effort at economic sabotage." He also credited Cloward-Piven with changing the cultural attitude toward welfare from that of a temporary expedient to a lifetime entitlement, an attitude which in-and-of-itself has caused perhaps the greatest damage of all.

Cloward and Piven looked at this strategy as a gold mine of opportunity. Within the newly organized groups, each offensive would find an ample pool of foot soldier recruits willing to advance its radical agenda at little or no pay, and expand its base of reliable voters, legal or otherwise. The radicals' threatening tactics also would accrue an intimidating reputation, providing a wealth of opportunities for extorting monetary and other concessions from the target organizations. In the meantime, successful offensives would create an ever increasing drag on society. As they gleefully observed:

Moreover, this kind of mass influence is cumulative because benefits are continuous. Once eligibility for basic food and rent grants is established, the drain on local resources persists indefinitely.

The next time you drive through one of the many blighted neighborhoods in our cities, or read of the astronomical crime, drug addiction, and out-of-wedlock birth rates, or consider the failed schools, strapped police and fire resources of every major city, remember Cloward and Piven's thrill that "...the drain on local resources persists indefinitely."

ACORN, the new tip of the Cloward-Piven spear

In 1970, one of George Wiley's protégés, Wade Rathke -- like Bill Ayers, a member of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) -- was sent to found the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now. While NWRO had made a good start, it alone couldn't accomplish the Cloward-Piven goals. Rathke's group broadened the offensive to include a wide array of low income "rights." Shortly thereafter they changed "Arkansas" to "Association of" and ACORN went nationwide.

Today ACORN is involved in a wide array of activities, including housing, voting rights, illegal immigration and other issues. According to ACORN's website: "ACORN is the nation's largest grassroots community organization of low-and moderate-income people with over 400,000 member families organized into more than 1,200 neighborhood chapters in 110 cities across the country," It is perhaps the largest radical group in the U.S. and has been cited for widespread criminal activity on many fronts.


On voting rights, ACORN and its voter mobilization subsidiary, Project Vote, have been involved nationwide in efforts to grant felons the vote and lobbied heavily for the Motor Voter Act of 1993, a law allowing people to register at motor vehicle departments, schools, libraries and other public places. That law had been sought by Cloward and Piven since the early1980s and they were present, standing behind President Clinton at the signing ceremony.

ACORN's voter rights tactics follow the Cloward-Piven Strategy:

1. Register as many Democrat voters as possible, legal or otherwise and help them vote, multiple times if possible.
2. Overwhelm the system with fraudulent registrations using multiple entries of the same name, names of deceased, random names from the phone book, even contrived names.
3. Make the system difficult to police by lobbying for minimal identification standards.

In this effort, ACORN sets up registration sites all over the country and has been frequently cited for turning in fraudulent registrations, as well as destroying republican applications. In the 2004-2006 election cycles alone, ACORN was accused of widespread voter fraud in 12 states. It may have swung the election for one state governor.

ACORN's website brags: "Since 2004, ACORN has helped more than 1.7 million low- and moderate-income and minority citizens apply to register to vote." Project vote boasts 4 million. I wonder how many of them are dead? For the 2008 cycle, ACORN and Project Vote have pulled out all the stops. Given their furious nationwide effort, it is not inconceivable that this presidential race could be decided by fraudulent votes alone.

Barack Obama ran ACORN's Project Vote in Chicago and his highly successful voter registration drive was credited with getting the disgraced former Senator Carol Moseley-Braun elected. Newsmax reiterates Cloward and Piven's aspirations for ACORN's voter registration efforts:

By advocating massive, no-holds-barred voter registration campaigns, they [Cloward & Piven] sought a Democratic administration in Washington, D.C. that would re-distribute the nation's wealth and lead to a totalitarian socialist state.

Illegal Immigration

As I have written elsewhere, the Radical Left's offensive to promote illegal immigration is "Cloward-Piven on steroids." ACORN is at the forefront of this movement as well, and was a leading organization among a broad coalition of radical groups, including Soros' Open Society Institute, the Service Employees International Union (ACORN founder Wade Rathke also runs a SEIU chapter), and others, that became the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform. CCIR fortunately failed to gain passage for the 2007 illegal immigrant amnesty bill, but its goals have not changed.

The burden of illegal immigration on our already overstressed welfare system has been widely documented. Some towns in California have even been taken over by illegal immigrant drug cartels. The disease, crime and overcrowding brought by illegal immigrants places a heavy burden on every segment of society and every level of government, threatening to split this country apart at the seams. In the meantime, radical leftist efforts to grant illegal immigrants citizenship guarantee a huge pool of new democrat voters. With little border control, terrorists can also filter in.

Obama aided ACORN as their lead attorney in a successful suit he brought against the Illinois state government to implement the Motor Voter law there. The law had been resisted by Republican Governor Jim Edgars, who feared the law was an opening to widespread vote fraud.

His fears were warranted as the Motor Voter law has since been cited as a major opportunity for vote fraud, especially for illegal immigrants, even terrorists. According to the Wall Street Journal: "After 9/11, the Justice Department found that eight of the 19 hijackers were registered to vote..."

ACORN's dual offensives on voting and illegal immigration are handy complements. Both swell the voter rolls with reliable democrats while assaulting the country ACORN seeks to destroy with overwhelming new problems.

Mortgage Crisis

And now we have the mortgage crisis, which has sent a shock wave through Wall Street and panicked world financial markets like no other since the stock market crash of 1929. But this is a problem created in Washington long ago. It originated with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), signed into law in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter. The CRA was Carter's answer to a grassroots activist movement started in Chicago, and forced banks to make loans to low income, high risk customers. PhD economist and former Texas Senator Phil Gramm has called it: "a vast extortion scheme against the nation's banks."

ACORN aggressively sought to expand loans to low income groups using the CRA as a whip. Economist Stan Leibowitz wrote in the New York Post:

In the 1980s, groups such as the activists at ACORN began pushing charges of "redlining"-claims that banks discriminated against minorities in mortgage lending. In 1989, sympathetic members of Congress got the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act amended to force banks to collect racial data on mortgage applicants; this allowed various studies to be ginned up that seemed to validate the original accusation.

In fact, minority mortgage applications were rejected more frequently than other applications-but the overwhelming reason wasn't racial discrimination, but simply that minorities tend to have weaker finances.

ACORN showed its colors again in 1991, by taking over the House Banking Committee room for two days to protest efforts to scale back the CRA. Obama represented ACORN in the Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank, 1994 suit against redlining. Most significant of all, ACORN was the driving force behind a 1995 regulatory revision pushed through by the Clinton Administration that greatly expanded the CRA and laid the groundwork for the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac borne financial crisis we now confront. Barack Obama was the attorney representing ACORN in this effort. With this new authority, ACORN used its subsidiary, ACORN Housing, to promote subprime loans more aggressively.

As a New York Post article describes it:

A 1995 strengthening of the Community Reinvestment Act required banks to find ways to provide mortgages to their poorer communities. It also let community activists intervene at yearly bank reviews, shaking the banks down for large pots of money.

Banks that got poor reviews were punished; some saw their merger plans frustrated; others faced direct legal challenges by the Justice Department.

Flexible lending programs expanded even though they had higher default rates than loans with traditional standards. On the Web, you can still find CRA loans available via ACORN with "100 percent financing . . . no credit scores . . . undocumented income . . . even if you don't report it on your tax returns." Credit counseling is required, of course.

Ironically, an enthusiastic Fannie Mae Foundation report singled out one paragon of nondiscriminatory lending, which worked with community activists and followed "the most flexible underwriting criteria permitted." That lender's $1 billion commitment to low-income loans in 1992 had grown to $80 billion by 1999 and $600 billion by early 2003.

The lender they were speaking of was Countrywide, which specialized in subprime lending and had a working relationship with ACORN.

Investor's Business Daily added:

The revisions also allowed for the first time the securitization of CRA-regulated loans containing subprime mortgages. The changes came as radical "housing rights" groups led by ACORN lobbied for such loans. ACORN at the time was represented by a young public-interest lawyer in Chicago by the name of Barack Obama. (Emphasis, mine.)

Since these loans were to be underwritten by the government sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the implicit government guarantee of those loans absolved lenders, mortgage bundlers and investors of any concern over the obvious risk. As Bloomberg reported: "It is a classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit."

And if you think Washington policy makers cared about ACORN's negative influence, think again. Before this whole mess came down, a Democrat-sponsored bill on the table would have created an "Affordable Housing Trust Fund," granting ACORN access to approximately $500 million in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac revenues with little or no oversight.

Even now, unbelievably -- on the brink of national disaster -- Democrats have insisted ACORN benefit from bailout negotiations! Senator Lindsay Graham reported last night (9/25/08) in an interview with Greta Van Susteren of On the Record that Democrats want 20 percent of the bailout money to go to ACORN!

This entire fiasco represents perhaps the pinnacle of ACORN's efforts to advance the Cloward-Piven Strategy and is a stark demonstration of the power they wield in Washington.

Enter Barack Obama

In attempting to capture the significance of Barack Obama's Radical Left connections and his relation to the Cloward Piven strategy, I constructed following flow chart. It is by no means complete. There are simply too many radical individuals and organizations to include them all here. But these are perhaps the most significant.

The chart puts Barack Obama at the epicenter of an incestuous stew of American radical leftism. Not only are his connections significant, they practically define who he is. Taken together, they constitute a who's who of the American radical left, and guiding all is the Cloward-Piven strategy.

Conspicuous in their absence are any connections at all with any other group, moderate, or even mildly leftist. They are all radicals, firmly bedded in the anti-American, communist, socialist, radical leftist mesh.

Saul Alinsky

Most people are unaware that Barack Obama received his training in "community organizing" from Saul Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation. But he did. In and of itself that marks his heritage and training as that of a radical activist. One really needs go no further. But we have.

Bill Ayers

Obama objects to being associated with SDS bomber Bill Ayers, claiming he is being smeared with "guilt by association." But they worked together at the Woods Fund. The Wall Street Journal added substantially to our knowledge by describing in great detail Obama's work over five years with SDS bomber Bill Ayers on the board of a non-profit, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, to push a radical agenda on public school children. As Stanley Kurtz states:

"...the issue here isn't guilt by association; it's guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago."

Also included in the mix is Theresa Heinz Kerry's favorite charity, the Tides Foundation. A partial list of Tides grants tells you all you need to know: ACLU, ACORN, Center for American Progress, Center for Constitutional Rights (a communist front,) CAIR, Earth Justice, Institute for Policy Studies (KGB spy nest), National Lawyers Guild (oldest communist front in U.S.), People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and practically every other radical group there is. ACORN's Wade Rathke runs a Tides subsidiary, the Tides Center.

Carl Davidson and the New Party

We have heard about Bomber Bill, but we hear little about fellow SDS member Carl Davidson. According to Discover the Networks, Davidson was an early supporter of Barack Obama and a prominent member of Chicago's New Party, a synthesis of CPUSA members, Socialists, ACORN veterans and other radicals. Obama sought and received the New Party's endorsement, and they assisted with his campaign. The New Party also developed a strong relationship with ACORN. As an excellent article on the New Party observes: "Barack Obama knew what he was getting into and remains an ideal New Party candidate."

George Soros

The chart also suggests the reason for George Soros' fervent support of Obama. The President of his Open Society Institute is Aryeh Neier, founder of the radical Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). As mentioned above, three other former SDS members had extensive contact with Obama: Bill Ayers, Carl Davidson and Wade Rathke. Surely Aryeh Neier would have heard from his former colleagues of the promising new politician. More to the point, Neier is firmly committed to supporting the hugely successful radical organization, ACORN, and would be certain back their favored candidate, Barack Obama.


Obama has spent a large portion of his professional life working for ACORN or its subsidiaries, representing ACORN as a lawyer on some of its most critical issues, and training ACORN leaders. Stanley Kurtz's excellent National Review article, "Inside Obama's Acorn." also describes Obama's ACORN connection in detail. But I can't improve on Obama's own words:

I've been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career (emphasis added). Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work. - Barack Obama, Speech to ACORN, November 2007 (Courtesy Newsmax.)

In another excellent article on Obama's ACORN connections, Newsmax asks a nagging question:

It would be telling to know if Obama, during his years at Columbia, had occasion to meet Cloward and study the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

I ask you, is it possible ACORN would train Obama to take leadership positions within ACORN without telling him what he was training for? Is it possible ACORN would put Obama in leadership positions without clueing him into what his purpose was?? Is it possible that this most radical of organizations would put someone in charge of training its trainers, without him knowing what it was he was training them for?

As a community activist for ACORN; as a leadership trainer for ACORN; as a lead organizer for ACORN's Project Vote; as an attorney representing ACORN's successful efforts to impose Motor Voter regulations in Illinois; as ACORN's representative in lobbying for the expansion of high risk housing loans through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to the current crisis; as a recipient of their assistance in his political campaigns -- both with money and campaign workers; it is doubtful that he was unaware of ACORN's true goals. It is doubtful he was unaware of the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

Fast-forward to 2005 when an obsequious, servile and scraping Daniel Mudd, CEO of Fannie Mae spoke at the Congressional Black Caucus swearing in ceremony for newly-elected Illinois Senator, Barack Obama. Mudd called, the Congressional Black Caucus "our family" and "the conscience of Fannie Mae."

In 2005, Republicans sought to rein in Fannie and Freddie. Senator John McCain was at the forefront of that effort. But it failed due to an intense lobbying effort put forward by Fannie and Freddie.

In his few years as a U.S. senator, Obama has received campaign contributions of $126,349, from Fannie and Freddie, second only to the $165,400 received by Senator Chris Dodd, who has been getting donations from them since 1988. What makes Obama so special?

His closest advisers are a dirty laundry list of individuals at the heart of the financial crisis: former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson; Former Fannie Mae CEO and former Clinton Budget Director Frank Raines; and billionaire failed Superior Bank of Chicago Board Chair Penny Pritzker.

Johnson had to step down as adviser on Obama's V.P. search after this gem came out:

An Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) report[1] from September 2004 found that, during Johnson's tenure as CEO, Fannie Mae had improperly deferred $200 million in expenses. This enabled top executives, including Johnson and his successor, Franklin Raines, to receive substantial bonuses in 1998.[2] A 2006 OFHEO report[3] found that Fannie Mae had substantially under-reported Johnson's compensation. Originally reported as $6-7 million, Johnson actually received approximately $21 million.

Obama denies ties to Raines but the Washington Post calls him a member of "Obama's political circle." Raines and Johnson were fined $3 million by the Office of Federal Housing Oversight for their manipulation of Fannie books. The fine is small change however, compared to the $50 million Raines was able to obtain in improper bonuses as a result of juggling the books.

Most significantly, Penny Pritzker, the current Finance Chairperson of Obama's presidential campaign helped develop the complicated investment bundling of subprime securities at the heart of the meltdown. She did so in her position as shareholder and board chair of Superior Bank. The Bank failed in 2001, one of the largest in recent history, wiping out $50 million in uninsured life savings of approximately 1,400 customers. She was named in a RICO class action law suit but doesn't seem to have come out of it too badly.

As a young attorney in the 1990s, Barack Obama represented ACORN in Washington in their successful efforts to expand Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) authority. In addition to making it easier for ACORN groups to force banks into making risky loans, this also paved the way for banks like Superior to package mortgages as investments, and for the Government Sponsored Enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to underwrite them. These changes created the conditions that ultimately lead to the current financial crisis.

Did they not know this would occur? Were these smart people, led by a Harvard graduate, unaware of the Econ 101 concept of moral hazard that would result from the government making implicit guarantees to underwrite private sector financial risk? They should have known that freeing the high-risk mortgage market of risk, calamity was sure to ensue. I think they did.

Barack Obama, the Cloward-Piven candidate, no matter how he describes himself, has been a radical activist for most of his political career. That activism has been in support of organizations and initiatives that at their heart seek to tear the pillars of this nation asunder in order to replace them with their demented socialist vision. Their influence has spread so far and so wide that despite their blatant culpability in the current financial crisis, they are able to manipulate Capital Hill politicians to cut them into $140 billion of the bailout pie!

God grant those few responsible yet remaining in Washington, DC the strength to prevent this massive fraud from occurring. God grant them the courage to stand up in the face of this Marxist tidal wave.